Net Interest continues moving up
This article first appeared on SchiffGold.
The Federal Government ran a deficit of -$39B in January. While that may not seem like much, it looks worse when compared to the average January.
The chart below shows the month of January historically. The government actually ran a surplus in January the four years leading up to 2020. Even last year the government ran a surplus greater than $118B. YoY the chart shows that expenses increased by a wide margin while revenue decreased.
For the decade prior to Covid, January averaged a surplus of $25B, so this January is definitely off the mark. Let’s look through the data…
The Sankey diagram below shows the distribution of spending and revenue. The Deficit represented only 8% of total spending while Income Taxes accounted for 54% of the total spent.
Looking at the TTM, the January deficit saw a very different distribution where the deficit represented 24.52% of overall spending with Income Taxes only covering 40%.
January saw the largest monthly revenue from Net Income Taxes since April of last year. This helped offset the MoM fall in corporate taxes.
Total Expenses were down slightly, mostly attributable to a drop in National Defense spending.
As discussed in the debt analysis, the total net interest payments on the national debt are still exploding higher as interest rates rise. In the latest period, the TTM interest expense was $533B dollars. Annualizing out the January Net Interest Expense pushes the total to almost $600B. That is just on debt servicing!
The table below goes deeper into the numbers of each category. The key takeaways from the charts and table:
Outlays
Receipts
Total
Most importantly, the total TTM Deficit was $1.58T which is much higher than the $1.4T last month.
Monthly and Average Monthly Comparison | Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) Comparison | |||||||||
Category | Jan 2023 | Jan 2022 | TTM Avg Monthly | YoY % Change | TTM % Change | TTM Ending | TTM Ending | TTM Ending | TTM | TTM |
Outlay | ||||||||||
Social Security | -113.5 | -101.7 | -104.6 | 11.6% | 8.5% | -1,255.5 | -1,152.2 | -1,110.8 | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Income Security | -81.3 | -47.2 | -70.6 | 72.4% | 15.2% | -847.1 | -1,489.3 | -1,541.5 | -43.1% | -45.0% |
Medicare | -71.4 | -64.9 | -62.0 | 10.1% | 15.3% | -743.5 | -701.4 | -751.7 | 6.0% | -1.1% |
Health | -69.1 | -74.1 | -75.3 | -6.8% | -8.3% | -904.1 | -845.1 | -805.4 | 7.0% | 12.3% |
Net Interest | -49.8 | -34.4 | -44.4 | 44.8% | 12.1% | -533.1 | -376.0 | -326.1 | 41.8% | 63.5% |
National Defense | -49.6 | -47.0 | -64.8 | 5.4% | -23.5% | -777.2 | -750.8 | -734.4 | 3.5% | 5.8% |
Other | -20.7 | 49.4 | -33.4 | -141.9% | -38.0% | -400.5 | -795.5 | -1,181.9 | -49.7% | -66.1% |
Education & Social Services | -18.9 | -16.3 | -58.0 | 15.8% | -67.4% | -695.4 | -319.1 | -240.7 | 117.9% | 188.9% |
Veterans Benefits and Services | -11.8 | -10.2 | -22.7 | 16.0% | -47.8% | -272.2 | -240.9 | -215.2 | 13.0% | 26.5% |
Receipt | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous Receipts | 1.9 | 11.9 | 8.6 | -83.9% | -77.8% | 103.5 | 138.9 | 125.7 | -25.5% | -17.7% |
Customs Duties | 6.8 | 8.6 | 8.0 | -20.4% | -14.8% | 96.3 | 88.3 | 64.5 | 9.0% | 49.2% |
Other | 13.7 | 12.2 | 15.6 | 12.5% | -11.9% | 187.2 | 180.7 | 149.0 | 3.6% | 25.7% |
Corporation Income Taxes | 20.8 | 13.6 | 36.6 | 53.4% | -43.0% | 438.8 | 398.7 | 221.3 | 10.1% | 98.3% |
Social Security Taxes | 141.7 | 129.7 | 121.0 | 9.3% | 17.1% | 1,451.9 | 1,277.9 | 1,283.0 | 13.6% | 13.2% |
Individual Income Taxes | 262.3 | 289.2 | 214.5 | -9.3% | 22.3% | 2,574.5 | 2,290.4 | 1,585.7 | 12.4% | 62.4% |
Total | ||||||||||
Outlay | -486.1 | -346.4 | -535.7 | 40.3% | -9.3% | -6,428.7 | -6,670.3 | -6,907.8 | -3.6% | -6.9% |
Receipt | 447.3 | 465.1 | 404.3 | -3.8% | 10.6% | 4,852.2 | 4,374.9 | 3,429.2 | 10.9% | 41.5% |
Total | -38.8 | 118.7 | -131.4 | -132.7% | -70.5% | -1,576.6 | -2,295.4 | -3,478.6 | -31.3% | -54.7% |
Data as of: Jan 2023. % Changes are capped at 1,000%. |
Zooming out and looking over the history of the budget back to 1980 shows a complete picture. It shows how a new level of spending has been reached that is far above pre-Covid levels. While a similar increase in tax revenues has helped, revenues have already started coming back down. This is extremely problematic as it is much harder to cut spending and/or raise taxes. If this trend continues, budget deficits could well exceed $2T in short order.
The next two charts zoom in on the recent periods to show the change when compared to pre-Covid.
As shown below, total Receipts have surged higher the last two years driven by Social Security, Corporate Taxes, and Individual Taxes. In two years, total revenue has climbed by $1.42T or 41%.
Spending has also seen the massive surge, blasting well past $6T per year for the last three years.
One bright spot for the Federal Government is that Social Security remains solvent (for now). The difference between revenue and payouts can be seen below. This comes at a price of course, over the last 10 years, the level of wages subject to Social Security tax has increased 41% from 113k to 160k in 2023. The increase from 2022 to 2023 was a whopping 9%, one of the biggest moves upward on record.
Despite massive expenditures driving huge deficits, the Deficit is down YoY as mentioned above. This has brought the TTM Deficit compared to GDP down to pre-Covid levels. It has moved back up in recent months and is now at 6% of GDP, up from 3.9% as recently as August.
Note: GDP Axis is set to log scale
Tax Revenues are falling while elevated levels of spending are not. This is very problematic for the Treasury. Interest Expense alone is chewing up more than $500B in tax revenues. There is a perfect storm brewing as the labor market continues to weaken, the stock market stays choppy, and corporations report less revenues. All of this will lead to less tax revenue. Add in the high probability of a recession, where the government will be asked to spend more and the Treasury could blow past the record budget deficits of the Covid era.
Sure, the Fed is talking tough and holding tight. But that can only last so long before the math catches up to them. In the recent Schiff Gold podcast, Mike Maharrey stressed the fact that these things take a long time to play out. He specifically quoted an article from September 2007 that discussed how inflation was coming down and that the Fed should get the soft landing it desires. Whoops, spoke a bit too soon. This time around is no different, everyone is jumping to the conclusion that the Fed has already won.
Sorry, but no. These things take time to play out. Usually longer than most people expect (including myself). We are still in the very early innings of this. When something breaks, look out below. 2008 will look like sunshine and rainbows.
Data Source: Monthly Treasury Statement
Data Updated: Monthly on eighth business day
Last Updated: Period ending Jan 2023
US Debt interactive charts and graphs can always be found on the Exploring Finance dashboard: https://exploringfinance.shinyapps.io/USDebt/