Jobs: A Weak Report is Even Weaker in the Details

SchiffGold US Debt Employment

Household Survey Continues to Show Extreme Weakness

Exploring Finance https://exploringfinance.github.io/
09-06-2024

This article first appeared on SchiffGold.

The analysis below covers the Employment picture released on the first Friday of every month. While most of the attention goes to the headline number, it can be helpful to look at the details, revisions, and other reports to get a better gauge of what is really going on.

The BLS reported a gain of 142k jobs which was in line with expectations. For the first time since March, it was below the Household report which showed 168k jobs.

Figure 1: Primary Report vs Household Survey - Monthly

Despite the Household Survey coming in slightly higher, for the year the gap is still very wide. The Headline Report is 1.47M vs the Household Aurvey showing 251k, representing 17%. This is by far the largest miss in over a decade.

Figure 2: Primary Report vs Household Survey - Annual

The BLS also publishes the data behind their Birth/Death assumptions (formation of new business). In August, the BLS assumed 100k jobs added in their birth/death assumptions. This is relatively modest compared to previous months and perhaps explains why the Household Survey surprised the Headline Report.

Figure 3: Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions - Monthly

The annual view shows that birth/death assumptions are positive while the economy has actually experienced job losses according to the raw numbers. It’s not until they seasonally adjust the numbers that it all turns positive.

Figure 4: Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions - Monthly

There is another report published by the BLS called the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). According to the BLS, this is a far more accurate and rigorous report covering 95% of jobs available at a highly detailed level. Due to the rigor, the report is released quarterly on a 7 month lag. This report made all the headlines last week with the major revisions down.

The QECW had a big miss in February in particular.

Figure 5: Primary Report vs QCEW - Yearly

On an annual basis, you can see that the QCEW has underperformed the Headline Report for three years in a row now. It is most appropriate to compare the raw Headline numbers, rather than the seasonally adjusted numbers. Based on this comparison, the QCEW is showing job losses of 1.43M vs only 1.06M losses for the Headline Report. That is a massive miss!

Figure 6: Primary Report vs QCEW - Yearly

Digging Into the Report

The 142k jobs was accompanied by an unemployment rate falling to 4.2%%.

Figure 7: Change by sector

Another level of detail in the Household report shows full-time vs part-time job holders. In August, there were a large amount of full-time employees converting to part-time. This is not a promising sign.

Figure 8: Full Time vs Part Time

Jobs by Category

Almost every job category was at or below the 12-month trend except for Construction and Leisure/Hospitality.

Figure 9: Current vs TTM

The table below shows a detailed breakdown of the numbers.

Monthly Average Change

Total % Change

Category

Total Employed

Current Month

3 Months

12 Months

3 years

Current Month

3 Months

12 Months

3 years

Private Sector

Construction

8,280

34

21.7

19.0

23.6

0.4%

0.8%

2.8%

10.3%

Education Health

26,438

47

61.3

79.9

76.0

0.2%

0.7%

3.6%

10.3%

Financial

9,258

11

7.7

2.9

12.1

0.1%

0.2%

0.4%

4.7%

Information

2,993

-7

-7.3

-0.3

2.6

-0.2%

-0.7%

-0.1%

3.2%

Leisure Hospitality

16,976

46

24.7

24.6

65.8

0.3%

0.4%

1.7%

14.0%

Manufacturing

12,927

-24

-11.3

-1.2

14.6

-0.2%

-0.3%

-0.1%

4.1%

Mining and Logging

635

0

0.3

-0.8

1.9

0.0%

0.2%

-1.4%

11.0%

Other Services

5,911

1

1.3

5.4

10.8

0.0%

0.1%

1.1%

6.6%

Prof Business

22,975

8

-5.3

9.2

41.6

0.0%

-0.1%

0.5%

6.5%

Trade Trans Utils

29,047

2

3.3

17.2

37.1

0.0%

0.0%

0.7%

4.6%

Government

Government Federal

2,997

1

1.0

4.8

3.0

0.0%

0.1%

1.9%

3.6%

Government Local

14,895

22

13.0

25.8

23.4

0.1%

0.3%

2.1%

5.7%

Government State

5,447

1

6.0

9.8

8.2

0.0%

0.3%

2.2%

5.5%

Total

All

158,779

142

116.3

196.5

320.9

0.1%

0.2%

1.5%

7.3%

Values in 1,000s of workers. Data as of: Aug 2024. Total Employed = Entire size of the labor market.

Revisions

The chart below shows how the jobs data has been revised in recent months. There have been significant downward revisions since January of this year. Even the weak jobs report in July was revised down from 114k to 89k.

Figure 10: Revisions

Over the last three months, the data has been revised down by an average of 13k per month and 26k over 12 months. These revisions go unnoticed by the mainstream.

3 Month Compare

12 Month Compare

3 Year Compare

Category

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Private Sector

Construction

44

86

-14.0

225

242

-1.4

833

746

2.4

Education Health

206

186

6.7

1,005

984

1.8

2,703

2,690

0.4

Financial

24

16

2.7

28

51

-1.9

444

313

3.6

Information

-16

-21

1.7

-15

-2

-1.1

132

117

0.4

Leisure Hospitality

46

76

-10.0

301

436

-11.2

2,444

2,283

4.5

Manufacturing

-7

-31

8.0

12

20

-0.7

598

524

2.1

Mining and Logging

-3

-1

-0.7

-9

-11

0.2

73

66

0.2

Other Services

10

12

-0.7

80

69

0.9

425

380

1.2

Prof Business

31

-10

13.7

101

149

-4.0

1,591

1,462

3.6

Trade Trans Utils

42

38

1.3

176

257

-6.8

1,395

1,276

3.3

Government

Government Federal

3

7

-1.3

68

58

0.8

106

103

0.1

Government Local

45

70

-8.3

309

351

-3.5

850

596

7.1

Government State

-2

34

-12.0

145

137

0.7

282

177

2.9

Total

All

423

462

-13.0

2,426

2,741

-26.2

11,876

10,733

31.8

Values in 1,000s of workers. Because this data is focused on revisions, it is as of the month prior: Jul 2024. "Current" shows the change in employment after revisions. "As Of Published" shows change in employment at time of release. "Avg Month Diff" shows the average monthly change from the revisions.

Historical Perspective

The chart below shows data going back to 1955.

Figure 11: Historical Labor Market

The labor force participation rate is still well below the highs before the Global Financial Crisis. This month it stayed steady at 62.7%.

Figure 12: Labor Market Distribution

Conclusion

Job numbers continue to come in weak which is putting pressure on the Fed to begin cutting aggressively now. The problem is that inflation has not been fully squashed. This could lead the economy down the very dangerous path of Stagflation.