Jobs: Household Survey Shows Negative Job Gains YTD

SchiffGold US Debt Employment

Household Survey and QCEW are both in bad shape

Exploring Finance https://exploringfinance.github.io/
12-06-2024

This article first appeared on SchiffGold.

The analysis below covers the Employment picture released on the first Friday of every month. While most of the attention goes to the Headline Report, it can be helpful to look at the details, revisions, and other reports to get a better gauge of what is really going on.

The BLS reported a gain of 227k jobs which was in line or slightly above expectations. The bigger issue was that the Household Survey came in extremely weak at -355k jobs. This means the last two months have shown more than 700k jobs lost versus a positive gain of 250k+ in the Headline Report. In two months, the gap between the Headline and Household is nearly 1M jobs. These two reports could not be further apart!

Figure 1: Primary Report vs Household Survey - Monthly

This has been the case all year with the Headline diverging from the Household report by the most ever. For reference, last year was the worst year ever at that point with the Household Survey coming in 37.5% below the Headline Number. This year that number has exploded to -102.1%. Yes, while the Headline Report has shown 2M net new jobs, the Household Survey is negative.

Figure 2: Primary Report vs Household Survey - Annual

The BLS also publishes the data behind their Birth/Death assumptions (formation of new business). In November, the BLS actually assumed close to zero job gains from Birth/Death.

Figure 3: Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions - Monthly

Even though zero jobs were attributed to birth/death in November, this year still represents the largest number of jobs assumed into existence ever at 54.7%. This means the BLS has assumed more than half the job gains for the Headline Report. Maybe they need to adjust their assumptions!

Figure 4: Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions - Monthly

There is another report published by the BLS called the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). According to the BLS, this is a far more accurate and rigorous report covering 95% of jobs available at a highly detailed level. Due to the rigor, the report is released quarterly on a several month lag.

The latest report showed that Q2 was actually pretty close to the headline number.

Figure 5: Primary Report vs QCEW - Yearly

Even with Q2 looking more normal, YTD (through June), the QCEW is still coming in at the lowest rate (65%) of the Headline Report on record.

Figure 6: Primary Report vs QCEW - Yearly

Digging Into the Report

The 227k jobs number was accompanied by a pop in unemployment rate to 4.2%.

Figure 7: Change by sector

Jobs by Category

When looking over the last 12-month trend, the latest report shows a few categories that are above trend.

Figure 8: Current vs TTM

The table below shows a detailed breakdown of the numbers.

Monthly Average Change

Total % Change

Category

Total Employed

Current Month

3 Months

12 Months

3 years

Current Month

3 Months

12 Months

3 years

Private Sector

Construction

8,313

10

12.7

17.6

20.9

0.1%

0.5%

2.5%

9.0%

Education Health

26,707

79

79.0

80.0

79.4

0.3%

0.9%

3.6%

10.7%

Financial

9,280

17

9.7

4.4

10.3

0.2%

0.3%

0.6%

4.0%

Information

2,986

0

-1.7

-1.1

0.9

0.0%

-0.2%

-0.4%

1.1%

Leisure Hospitality

17,069

53

38.7

24.5

55.1

0.3%

0.7%

1.7%

11.6%

Manufacturing

12,887

22

-12.7

-5.1

9.8

0.2%

-0.3%

-0.5%

2.7%

Mining and Logging

640

2

1.7

0.0

1.9

0.3%

0.8%

0.0%

10.5%

Other Services

5,930

8

4.7

5.5

9.3

0.1%

0.2%

1.1%

5.7%

Prof Business

22,954

26

8.3

7.1

27.3

0.1%

0.1%

0.4%

4.3%

Trade Trans Utils

29,032

-23

-2.3

15.8

25.2

-0.1%

0.0%

0.7%

3.1%

Government

Government Federal

3,001

-2

1.3

4.1

3.1

-0.1%

0.1%

1.6%

3.7%

Government Local

14,955

15

13.0

24.2

25.8

0.1%

0.3%

1.9%

6.2%

Government State

5,534

20

20.3

12.6

11.4

0.4%

1.1%

2.7%

7.4%

Total

All

159,288

227

172.7

189.5

280.3

0.1%

0.3%

1.4%

6.3%

Values in 1,000s of workers. Data as of: Nov 2024. Total Employed = Entire size of the labor market.

Revisions

The chart below shows how the jobs data has been revised in recent months. There have been significant downward revisions since January of this year. The last two months have seen minimal changes though with a slight uptick from last months abysmal jobs report.

Figure 9: Revisions

The twelve-month revision trend is negative by 26.7k jobs per month.

3 Month Compare

12 Month Compare

3 Year Compare

Category

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Current

As Of Published

Avg Month Diff

Private Sector

Construction

56

43

4.3

216

249

-2.8

790

692

2.7

Education Health

225

217

2.7

991

943

4.0

2,826

2,846

-0.6

Financial

19

22

-1.0

40

68

-2.3

383

299

2.3

Information

-13

7

-6.7

4

9

-0.4

51

84

-0.9

Leisure Hospitality

72

127

-18.3

251

408

-13.1

2,059

2,149

-2.5

Manufacturing

-86

-31

-18.3

-58

-21

-3.1

368

376

-0.2

Mining and Logging

3

6

-1.0

-6

-6

0.0

68

66

0.1

Other Services

10

13

-1.0

68

67

0.1

352

366

-0.4

Prof Business

-48

-4

-14.7

69

118

-4.1

1,098

1,208

-3.1

Trade Trans Utils

19

-11

10.0

167

237

-5.8

1,079

1,004

2.1

Government

Government Federal

7

1

2.0

50

50

0.0

125

105

0.6

Government Local

50

52

-0.7

298

295

0.2

918

812

2.9

Government State

55

51

1.3

139

132

0.6

378

284

2.6

Total

All

369

493

-41.3

2,229

2,549

-26.7

10,495

10,291

5.7

Values in 1,000s of workers. Because this data is focused on revisions, it is as of the month prior: Oct 2024. "Current" shows the change in employment after revisions. "As Of Published" shows change in employment at time of release. "Avg Month Diff" shows the average monthly change from the revisions.

More Detail in the Household Survey

Another level of detail in the Household report shows full-time vs part-time job holders. In November, both full-time and part-time job holders lost jobs.

Figure 10: Full Time vs Part Time

Historical Perspective

The chart below shows data going back to 1955.

Figure 11: Historical Labor Market

The labor force participation rate is still well below the highs before the Global Financial Crisis. This month it stayed steady at 62.5%.

Figure 12: Labor Market Distribution

Conclusion

The data discrepancy between job reports has reached historic proportions. Both the QCEW and Household Survey paint a very bleak picture versus the Headline Report which shows pretty steady job growth. Based on the election of Donald Trump, one has to assume the economy is much weaker than what the main data values are showing. At some point, reality is going to catch up. At that point, the Fed will be in a lose-lose situation.